Entry tags:
BMI bullshit
[one of the many many reasons I like
saluqi so much is the way she has of pithily summarising almost anything with a perfect phrase. Handy when you're around someone like me, who rabbits on and on and on...]
Getting to the point, a couple of people on my friendslist have talked about BMI this week, and
commodorified posted a great link to a Flickr slideshow of Illustrated BMI Categories. It graphically shows how meaningless BMI is when it comes to assessing how healthy and attractive people can seem, even with an "excessive" BMI. It's one of my particular bugbears, since my BMI is "high" too.
I personally feel that body fat percentage might be a better gauge of how fat or not one might be - it seems like a better metric to use for any correlations with regard to health (since visceral fat - around the heart and organs - would probably have impacts. General body fat can make your hormones work differently as well). However, body fat percentage is hard to assess without doing an autopsy (no thanks!), and I have no idea how much research has been done that shows actual correlations between fat percentage and, say, heart disease.
It seems to me the BMI is a crappy instrument that doesn't account for anything, and it can have impacts on people's lives beyond the supposed health risks. For example, I had a checkup by a corporate doctor before going permanent in my job. He pointed out to me that my BMI indicated I was "overweight" and he needed to note that on his report. I asked him if it actually seemed that I was "overweight", and what, if any, impact it would have on my job - he replied that that was what the figures said, and it needed to be on the report. He couldn't tell me what BMI figure would actually be an issue for getting the position. I actually wasn't worried that it would have an impact on the hiring process - I mean, hello, I work at a desk all day - but what was the point? I assume they do the same test with air traffic controllers - but do they do cardiograms and the like which might show real problems? My understanding was that I got the same test that ATCs do... and so it would prove precisely nothing. I believe that health insurance in the US requires medical checks that include BMI - do premiums go up? Would I get knocked back from a job if my BMI exceeded a certain amount, even if I was capable of doing the physical tasks (for example, I can most definitely do the strength tests for the police - running is another matter, heh. Short Irish legs.).
I feel like getting very feministy about the patriarchal cabal that comes up with stupid figures to try and control all of us - was BMI invented by insurance companies to enhance their profits, for example - but I'm sure you can all take that part as read. :-) But do check out the Flickr slideshow; it's extremely illuminating.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Getting to the point, a couple of people on my friendslist have talked about BMI this week, and
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I personally feel that body fat percentage might be a better gauge of how fat or not one might be - it seems like a better metric to use for any correlations with regard to health (since visceral fat - around the heart and organs - would probably have impacts. General body fat can make your hormones work differently as well). However, body fat percentage is hard to assess without doing an autopsy (no thanks!), and I have no idea how much research has been done that shows actual correlations between fat percentage and, say, heart disease.
It seems to me the BMI is a crappy instrument that doesn't account for anything, and it can have impacts on people's lives beyond the supposed health risks. For example, I had a checkup by a corporate doctor before going permanent in my job. He pointed out to me that my BMI indicated I was "overweight" and he needed to note that on his report. I asked him if it actually seemed that I was "overweight", and what, if any, impact it would have on my job - he replied that that was what the figures said, and it needed to be on the report. He couldn't tell me what BMI figure would actually be an issue for getting the position. I actually wasn't worried that it would have an impact on the hiring process - I mean, hello, I work at a desk all day - but what was the point? I assume they do the same test with air traffic controllers - but do they do cardiograms and the like which might show real problems? My understanding was that I got the same test that ATCs do... and so it would prove precisely nothing. I believe that health insurance in the US requires medical checks that include BMI - do premiums go up? Would I get knocked back from a job if my BMI exceeded a certain amount, even if I was capable of doing the physical tasks (for example, I can most definitely do the strength tests for the police - running is another matter, heh. Short Irish legs.).
I feel like getting very feministy about the patriarchal cabal that comes up with stupid figures to try and control all of us - was BMI invented by insurance companies to enhance their profits, for example - but I'm sure you can all take that part as read. :-) But do check out the Flickr slideshow; it's extremely illuminating.
no subject
As for compliments, *blush*. Thanks!
no subject
If it's a factor, then it's a factor. Being male reduces my lifespan *far* more than being fat is purported to. Would it be reasonable to refuse to look at and care for my health until I get full hormone therapy and SRS surgery? (Is there any more evidence that infinitessimally small number of fat people who manage to become thin and stay that way long-term are actually healthier than there is that my life expectancy would go up if I had hormone therapy and SRS surgery?) Even if I could be slightly healthier by being thin and there were some mystical and magical way to make me that way, say by cutting out the part of my intestinal tract that allows me to process nutrients such that I become incontinent and can't eat more than a couple of tablespoons of food without throwing up, is it still reasonable to use that as a reason to discriminate, to deny decent health care, to refuse people jobs or promotions that they're absolutely qualified for, to create bonus structures at companies that exclude me, etc.?
Is the only problem with the BMI and how it's used today really that it fingers both of us rather than just me?
no subject
I had one person I had a brief involvement with who was very fat. I don't have a problem with size, but I did find myself having a problem with the fact a 30-year-old woman refused to walk 150 metres down a 10 degree slope because it was too hard for her - and she was not seeking medical care. I recognised that she had internalised the "I'm fat so I'm never going to be fit" thing, but I'm sure she had been given that message loud and clear from all kinds of people throughout her life. I tried encouraging her to go to a doctor to get whatever might be fixed, fixed, but given your experience, I'm (now) not surprised why she was adamant in her refusal.
The thing was, my last girlfriend was/is fatter, and has no problems with managing an extremely busy life... because her current doctor treats her health problems and not her weight. She did get browbeaten into an attempted gastric bypass a decade ago, and it luckily failed (after nearly killing her). Her heart got damaged by the surgery (and resulting infection), and not any goddamned weight "issues" she had previously. It makes me angry thinking of it.
no subject
no subject