trixtah: (Default)
Trixtah ([personal profile] trixtah) wrote 2009-08-23 01:44 pm (UTC)

Yes, it was massive FAIL when the Registrar accepted that wording. It's certainly in their power not to do so, and especially since there was quite a stink about it when the referendum was mooted.

Heh, yes, due to some Unseemly Influence I've previously been exposed to, I made that exact comparison on a kiwi blog where people were discussing the issue. Not so much the more nuanced part about it being more about the deliverer, but the fact that if positive reinforcement works - and physical punishment hasn't been shown to work better - then why wouldn't you prefer that method as much as possible?

But you're right, it is about the deliverer and the fucked-up behaviour they want to hold onto and justify. It's the major component in why the people behind these campaigns disgust me.

Post a comment in response:

You may post here only if trixtah has given you access; posting by non-Access List accounts has been disabled.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org