(no subject)

Date: 2006-12-10 01:01 am (UTC)
ext_8716: (Default)
I don't think that that sentence was so much what Lois actually said in the previous statements, just a side note: "By the way, we should know that high-status boys are the beneficiaries of all this carry-on".

That assertion I tend to agree with (although there may be some exceptions), but Lois just didn't expand on it there. Perhaps because it's pretty self-evident, most of the time.

It's not so much As competing with other As for status so as to get Bs so much for boys, I think. Girls/women don't seem to compete for status as an end in itself as much as boys/men do. There are many many exceptions, of course, but it's pretty easy for a woman who seems to be all about gaining status to be tarred with the "dyke" brush, still. However, it's fine for a guy to be purely "success-orientated" without having to geneflect at the altar of "sacrificed (wo)manhood". High status men don't need to seduce their mates; I think the women still generally do.

</ insert standard disclaimer about <i>all men and all women not neatly falling into any categories defined>
You may post here only if trixtah has given you access; posting by non-Access List accounts has been disabled.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

trixtah: (Default)
Trixtah

January 2016

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425 2627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags