(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-06 03:22 am (UTC)
Also denied, I'm not a member.

Based on the info you've supplied, yes it's kiddie porn. I'm guessing that as no kids were (apparently) involved in making it, they consider it less evil than photos/films? My reaction would be that you can never be sure what was used as a model, but that the net effect is the same. How would they explain it to a cop? "It's is OK Officer, it's just a drawing?" Good luck with that.

I do think it's disingenuous not to acknowledge that kids and animals and non-con fail the reasonable person test when it comes to what is likely to be considered offensive. You can expect those things will upset people and I think it's courteous to provide a warning.

The other thing is, as I think we've discussed before, LJ users can be really clueless about what is actually illegal, especially illegal with serious consequences. Like that horse fucker over on [livejournal.com profile] polyamory at the moment.

Putting stuff that can get you arrested or fired (and it sounds like that drawing definitely fits that criteria) out into a space without a warning strikes me as not just offensive and rude, but stupid as well.
You may post here only if trixtah has given you access; posting by non-Access List accounts has been disabled.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

trixtah: (Default)
Trixtah

January 2016

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425 2627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags