Yes, to all this, and thanks for laying it out in such concise points, especially with regard to the disingenuous of their position.
I didn't remember to mention the legal argument, bugger it, since it now seems that a (quasi?)legal definition of "child porn" in the US requires that a real child be exploited - we're not all in the US!
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-06 04:40 am (UTC)I didn't remember to mention the legal argument, bugger it, since it now seems that a (quasi?)legal definition of "child porn" in the US requires that a real child be exploited - we're not all in the US!