trixtah: (Default)
Trixtah ([personal profile] trixtah) wrote2007-02-02 08:07 pm
Entry tags:

Some questions for the lay-deez

I'm in the process of reading O: The Intimate History of the Orgasm, which is fairly decent in a popular-science kind of way. However, the author has just characterised virtually all women as being multi-orgasmic, and I must say that's not exactly my experience. I think less than half of the women I've had sex with could do it consistently.

So, with that in mind, I'm desperately curious to see if it's just me. *snicker*

I'm trying to get how you experience it in general - we all have ups and downs and varitions, but I would like an impression of your average kind of responses. Feel free to comment if I've made some terrible omission, or you want to add something. If you don't really want the entire universe to know how you come, I've enabled anonymous commenting. :-)

[Poll #919138]
ext_8716: (Default)

[identity profile] trixtah.livejournal.com 2007-02-02 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Woo hoo! I win!!

But does it count as true nerdiness if it's about sex? I got told recently that Torchwood is crap, because us SF geeks don't need to have sex in a story, at all.

[identity profile] pretentiousgit.livejournal.com 2007-02-02 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)
No way. I favour nerdy sex statistics over all others, particularly given the way my winter is going. I haven't fallen in with Torchwood yet - like almost all entertainment, I keep putting it off until I can breathe again.
ironed_orchid: watercolour and pen style sketch of a brown tabby cat curl up with her head looking up at the viewer and her front paw stretched out on the left (Default)

[personal profile] ironed_orchid 2007-02-02 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)
It's totally possible to be a nerd about sex, I offer my "Kinsey π [pi]" badge, made by [livejournal.com profile] baglieg as proof.