Ah, gender essentialism

Now, the original site is not being too earnest about it, but there is a tool that will have a guess of your gender depending on your browsing history (not all of it, just some weighted sites - the formula and the statistics source are explained in the post). Here are my results:

Likelihood of you being FEMALE is 0%
Likelihood of you being MALE is 100%

Site	Male-Female Ratio
youtube.com	1
wikipedia.org	1.08
flickr.com	1.15
livejournal.com	0.68
merriam-webster.com	0.89
huffingtonpost.com	1.35
isohunt.com	1.94
wired.com	1.41
thepiratebay.org	2.13
guardian.co.uk	1.33
salon.com	1.13
megaupload.com	1.5
boingboing.net	1.5
stumbleupon.com	1.15
wordreference.com	0.94
treehugger.com	1.25
icanhascheezburger.com	1.04
tomshardware.com	2.33
tucows.com	1.6
abc.net.au	1.11
smh.com.au	1.2
okcupid.com	1.06
gutenberg.org	1.06

(and one more embarrassing one that I have expunged)

So, from this, we can see that women aren't interested in bittorrenting or hardware, and less interested in news than dictionaries. I'll have to go out right now and get my huntin' and shootin' gear, my season tickets to the All Blacks, start scratching my nuts more often, and acquire some bimbo girlfriend who only wants to have babeez. I still feel like I'm missing something...?

PS. All you LiveJournallers are a bunch of gurlz. So there.