trixtah: (Default)
[personal profile] trixtah
What a surprise. The Australian government trailing after Bush, wagging its little tail behind them:

Australia joins U.S. call for bigger U.N. role in Iraq
Australia asked the United Nations on Friday to take a bigger role in Iraq, particularly in helping to quell sectarian violence.

[Downer:] "We would like to see the United Nations become more active [in Iraq] than it already is and would like to see the United Nations perhaps working to take some sort of initiative to assist with the process of reconciliation over and above what it's already doing,"

Well, that tune has changed a bit from the previous line that if the UN isn't going to rubber-stamp US decisions, they should butt out, hasn't it? Oh, the irony, it burns us. Or maybe they think the new Secretary-General will be more of a lapdog than Kofi Annan. Who knows?

The annoying thing is that if the UN do send troops - and given the mess the whole thing is in now, it'd be criminal not to - the NZ government and those others previously, er, agnostic on the whole war issue will be effectively subsidising this big cock-up. I hope that any such troop deployments will be on the condition of some policy and strategic governance, but I doubt that will be an option.

Also, I love Downer's usual incisive command of English.  I wonder if that particular usage of reconciliation has made it into the latest OED?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-21 01:37 am (UTC)
ext_8716: (Default)
From: [identity profile] trixtah.livejournal.com
ROFLMAO! That's perfect.

I would loooooove to see those headlines. :-)

Profile

trixtah: (Default)
Trixtah

January 2016

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425 2627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags