trixtah: (Default)
[personal profile] trixtah
Just because you're poly, it does not necessarily mean you are happy to see your partner engaging in sexual foreplay with someone else. Yes, for many poly people that's true, but "many loves" is actually not the same as "happy with group sex". I realise that might be surprising to some.

And to state that someone has "deeper issues" with the relationship when she is angry with her husband groping his g/f in front of her, when she has previously asked that he does not, is fucking rude, frankly.

Sure, it might mean that someone has issues with the poly thing or that particular person. So what? It doesn't actually matter, if they're willing to carry on the relationship on the agreed-to basis with no drama. But assuming, without knowing anyone involved, that "issues with the relationship" is the root cause of the dislike for PDAs, is just ridiculous.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-20 02:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kightp.livejournal.com
Aiyiyi.

Some days the stupid, it burrrrrns.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-20 10:11 am (UTC)
ext_8716: (Default)
From: [identity profile] trixtah.livejournal.com
Sooo much. >:-[

thoughts

Date: 2008-12-20 02:41 am (UTC)
ironed_orchid: watercolour and pen style sketch of a brown tabby cat curl up with her head looking up at the viewer and her front paw stretched out on the left (Default)
From: [personal profile] ironed_orchid
1. "Just because you're poly, it does not necessarily mean you are [fill in the blank]"

2. Wait. You mean that poly can be more than mostly het couples wanting a hot bi babe for group sex?

3. "Deeper issues" clearly includes getting upset when people break promises.

Re: thoughts

Date: 2008-12-20 10:14 am (UTC)
ext_8716: (Default)
From: [identity profile] trixtah.livejournal.com
Tee hee heee.

1. I know! There are poly people who aren't pagans, geeks, liberals, bisexual or open-minded in any way whatsoever. OMG!!1!

2. Um. I'm probably mistaken, at least according to those morons.

3. Some people are just too critical for words. What do you mean, "appropriate boundaries"?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-20 03:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] serenejournal.livejournal.com
Yep. I didn't have the energy to even deal with that thread.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-20 10:14 am (UTC)
ext_8716: (Default)
From: [identity profile] trixtah.livejournal.com
Heh, unfortunately, some of the more egregious comments energised me. It is good that the majority were sane.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-21 08:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] soulful-aimee.livejournal.com
TOTALLY agree here. I would not feel comfortable seeing any partner make out with someone else.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-22 12:51 pm (UTC)
ext_8716: (Default)
From: [identity profile] trixtah.livejournal.com
Nope. I've had a few threesomes, but that's kind of different if you're all engaged. And really, it's not my favourite thing. I thought for a long time that I wasn't really "non-monogamous" because I was into commitment and not into group sex. Thank god I got that one straightened out!

Profile

trixtah: (Default)
Trixtah

January 2016

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425 2627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags