![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
trixtahI wrote a wee paen to the joys of fisting on the ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
lez_sex_tips comm the other day (in response to a "WHO would do THAT?" kind of question - it's locked). Imagine my joy on checking later on and finding some wee darling has posted up this comment in response:
I also happened to get out the movie Domino on DVD, which is pretty much a parson's egg. However, I enjoyed it overall because of the cinematography (really!), and mainly because I got to see Keira Knightley smoking, wearing sweet f-a, shouting "Fuck!" a lot, punching men, raunching it up and brandishing big weapons. Eee!
That combination made me think later that maybe I should have been one of those fin de siècle "poisonous flower" type lesbians after all. I like it when someone has a lovely proper facade, and I get to dig past it.
Most of my g/fs have seemed exceedingly respectable (except when I go to the opposite extreme, which happens occasionally). Vicars' daughters? Marvie. Mormons? Church of Christ? Catholics? Anglicans? Baptists, Methodists and Presbyterians? Yep, and nearly all the lovers I had who were religious were very much so at points of their lives. That kind of passion for religion doesn't seem too far from other sorts of passions. And yep, converting that passion-wrapped-up-in-properness over to the dark side really works for me.
So, there's my twist. Aiding and abetting the corruption of the seemingly-innocent. The really innocent? Nah. Just the ones who are genuinely nicely depraved under that demure surface. They've all known it, too ("bringing out" isn't my particular bug), but they may not yet have acted on it. I personally prefer it when they have, and know just what they want.
Trite and clichéd, I know, but I never said I was the cool and trendy type. :-) But corrupting unsuspecting members of an advice community is just lovely.
lez_sex_tips comm the other day (in response to a "WHO would do THAT?" kind of question - it's locked). Imagine my joy on checking later on and finding some wee darling has posted up this comment in response:I think you just made my day.w00t! Corrupting the (perhaps not-so) young, excellent!
You also made me actually consider fisting. o_o
I also happened to get out the movie Domino on DVD, which is pretty much a parson's egg. However, I enjoyed it overall because of the cinematography (really!), and mainly because I got to see Keira Knightley smoking, wearing sweet f-a, shouting "Fuck!" a lot, punching men, raunching it up and brandishing big weapons. Eee!
That combination made me think later that maybe I should have been one of those fin de siècle "poisonous flower" type lesbians after all. I like it when someone has a lovely proper facade, and I get to dig past it.
Most of my g/fs have seemed exceedingly respectable (except when I go to the opposite extreme, which happens occasionally). Vicars' daughters? Marvie. Mormons? Church of Christ? Catholics? Anglicans? Baptists, Methodists and Presbyterians? Yep, and nearly all the lovers I had who were religious were very much so at points of their lives. That kind of passion for religion doesn't seem too far from other sorts of passions. And yep, converting that passion-wrapped-up-in-properness over to the dark side really works for me.
So, there's my twist. Aiding and abetting the corruption of the seemingly-innocent. The really innocent? Nah. Just the ones who are genuinely nicely depraved under that demure surface. They've all known it, too ("bringing out" isn't my particular bug), but they may not yet have acted on it. I personally prefer it when they have, and know just what they want.
Trite and clichéd, I know, but I never said I was the cool and trendy type. :-) But corrupting unsuspecting members of an advice community is just lovely.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-20 11:20 am (UTC)The corruptee doesn't have to be the passive sort, IMO. Heh. I mean, when you've got some nice sweet thing saying, "You know, I'd really like it if you'd do X to me"... well, who's doing the corrupting there?
And yep, I'm with you on being more the doer than the doee in certain realms. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-20 11:28 am (UTC)You're one of those people that I can't help thinking I'd really enjoy hanging out with IRL.