Mental discombulations
Aug. 4th, 2006 01:15 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I don't know what's going on this week, but in the last few days I've encountered some points of view I fairly vehemently disagree with, from people I ordinarily respect to the utmost. With some of these opinions, at least I know why the individual concerned has that belief, and that does help. Others, I have no idea where it comes from.
It's tricky. It's interesting what a double-standard I find myself having, since I certainly won't argue things as much as I would ordinarily... but that's the nature of the double-standard beast when you know someone personally.
It's unsettling. Normally I can think of some middle ground, but in some of these instances, I can't. It's having to rejig my opinions of people in relation to touchy areas - while not having that middle ground to fall back on - that is the disconcerting part.
Then there are implications of what that means about me. I'm obviously not as tolerant as I like to think I am. When it's someone who I don't care about, they're easily dismissed with "So, they're a fuckwit/wierd/ignorant". When it concerns someone where none of those things are patently the case, and I feel so bothered by it, it makes me wonder about the broader question of just how much I expect people to march in lockstep with my own opinions for me to want to be around them. And the answer to that question, for me, doesn't seem to be a particularly edifying one. Hm.
It's tricky. It's interesting what a double-standard I find myself having, since I certainly won't argue things as much as I would ordinarily... but that's the nature of the double-standard beast when you know someone personally.
It's unsettling. Normally I can think of some middle ground, but in some of these instances, I can't. It's having to rejig my opinions of people in relation to touchy areas - while not having that middle ground to fall back on - that is the disconcerting part.
Then there are implications of what that means about me. I'm obviously not as tolerant as I like to think I am. When it's someone who I don't care about, they're easily dismissed with "So, they're a fuckwit/wierd/ignorant". When it concerns someone where none of those things are patently the case, and I feel so bothered by it, it makes me wonder about the broader question of just how much I expect people to march in lockstep with my own opinions for me to want to be around them. And the answer to that question, for me, doesn't seem to be a particularly edifying one. Hm.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-04 08:07 am (UTC)There is a fairly long list of topics I try to avoid arguing about because if the other person is as entrenched as I am, it'll just be time wasted in a pissing match, and if the other person is going to insist on arguing only from objective facts and logic, they're not going to want to hear about my personal history or my religious beliefs. (In fact, I honestly don't expect my personal history or religious interpretations to convince anyone who doesn't share my personal history or religious belief--but that doesn't mean I can easily set them aside, you know?)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-04 08:30 am (UTC)I find that testing "person I know" to "person I don't know" approaches and attitudes is a really useful process personally. In my view, people are often hampered by excusing too much from those they know, and rejecting too much from those they don't. Not always, but often.
I also like what
As to whether I need people to march in lockstep, I don't, but there are some matters where a particular point of view will necessarily limit how close I get to a person.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-04 02:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-10 12:22 pm (UTC)