trixtah: (Default)
[personal profile] kightp made an interesting post on the role of religion/spirituality in her life, and since I'm not conventionally religious either, I thought it'd be fun to pick up and run with. Since we hear a lot of the voices of people who practise Religion with a big "R", it might be nice to get some differing perspectives in (or hear about why you do practise religion with a big "R" if you do).

1. What is your religious/spiritual tradition, if it has a name?

Pantheism is the label that fits the most, more precisely the branch of pantheism ("naturalistic") which takes in Spinozan philosophy and Taoist tenets, by not ascribing consciousness or agency to any godlike being, or the universe, for that matter. Still, the classical pantheist statement of "god is nature" has quite a lot of meaning for me, despite the fact the classical belief that nature/god/the universe has sentience is not one I can adhere to.

I find anything that tries to personify god or ascribe human-type qualities to a deity to be odd in the extreme. If you're considering an infinite being, why on earth limit it with those types of conceptions? So, I just sidestep the whole thing by not believing in a "being" at all, which one has to then try and define.

One of the most appealing things about it is that there is no ritualistic element at all, other than that of mindfulness. I really dislike nearly every ritual I've encountered - I find them incredibly pointless when you can just look at the sea, or the stars, or the shadows, or the shapes of the ferns, or listen to a friend's laugh, or hear fantastic music, or feel a lover's touch and be at one with something that is greater than yourself.

2. When did you adopt, dedicate yourself to, or otherwise adhere to this practice/religion?

Always, in terms of loving nature. I was quite taken with traditional Māori religion when I was a kid, which had gods for each of the elements, and of course, my favourite was Tāne Mahuta, the god of forests and birds, followed by Tangaroa, the god of the sea. I'd seen "pantheism" as a term quite early on, but it was always in the mis-used context of panentheism, which sees the universe as an expression of god. Once I located a book a few years ago which correctly distinguished between the terms, I was sold.

3. If your current practice/religion was not given you by your parents, how did you come by it?


My beliefs haven't really changed at all, but I've certainly evolved some of the intellectual concepts that go with it over time. And found the label, of course. My family are quite vehemently agnostic, which has a lot to do with rejecting the Catholicism of earlier generations.

4. How would you describe your spiritual state shortly before adopting your current practice/religion?

A bit vague really. I called myself "agnostic", but it didn't really encompass the quite deep spiritual feeling I've experienced in certain situations.

5. Have you ever lost your faith in a deity or system of belief?

Yes, atheism. I thought I was an atheist for a little while - and I suppose I am in terms of not believing in a god, immanent or otherwise - but I also quite frankly do not know how anyone can assert with total confidence that there is NO god. It's the whole question of proving a negative - you can't. And I include it in this question because I think absolute belief in atheism requires as much faith as any religion.

6. If you've ever lost faith in a deity or system of belief, have you regained that faith or developed faith in a different deity or system of belief?


Nope, I'm not one for faith, except in the interpersonal sense. And perhaps the underlying optimism that "everything will be ok".

7. What does your practice/religion give you?

Mindfulness, gratitude, ecstacy, happiness, connectedness, presence, grounding, refreshment, reassurance.

8. What does your practice/religion expect, require, or otherwise take from you?


Nothing but mindfulness/consciousness. If I switch it on, it's all there. How marvie is that? (although I might find it challenging if I were locked up in a prison cell with no view of natural light)
trixtah: (Default)
...not quite the opera, but close.

I went to see In Search of Mozart which is (naturally) a documentary about Mozart's life, released last month in honour of the 250th anniversary of his birth. I totally missed it! - his birthday, that is.

It's a fab documentary. Nice (modern) clips of the cities he travelled to, excerpts of the music (as you would expect), interviews with conductors, musicians and singers etc. The best part was voice actors reading excerpts from the correspondence between Mozart, his mother and father, and his wife.

Of course they ended it by playing some of the Requiem, which of course made me start snivelling as soon as the baritone and tenor did that first bar. Luckily then I could race home and download the whole thing (bad me, I'll be buying it tomorrow, as I've meant to for months) so I could listen to it.

Other than those first few bars (and that whole theme), the part in the Requiem that totally gets me is when you have the baritone handing off the melody to the tenor, and the tune wends its way through the contralto to the soprano. It's so ineffably gorgeous.

It's one of those pieces of music, like certain art (eg. Rothko's paintings - which must be seen in situ at the Tate to be properly appreciated), looking at the lush bush (no bush, but area nearby) from the top of the Waitakere ranges and down to the sea, like seeing at Orion in the night sky, and watching him move over the zenith slowly but inevitably - those things which just so make me incapable of being an atheist. Do I believe those things are "of god?". Not at all, only inasmuch as we are all god (o pantheist me).

It could be just an accident that we are capable of creating (and, just as significantly, appreciating) these things. But it doesn't feel that way. Which is probably just due to hormones (the full article linked from that cite is interesting too). Whether or not it's hormones, I don't care in the slightest. I'm just glad to be able to experience transcendence in those little shafts of sunlight through my mundane life.
trixtah: (Default)
Shortest day of the year, here, and yes, my body wants to be sitting by a flaming yule log, quaffing mead and eating lots of rich fatty food. A plum pudding would go down well right now too.

The earth (in the Southern Hemisphere) is at its quietest time, but I can see the tree outside my flat is just staring to produce the nodules that will turn into buds, then leaves. So we have the turning of the year, with the new growth in potentia.

And it's a good time for reflection.
This is how I "save my soul" by accomplishing a pure relationship between me and another person, me and other people ... me and the animals, me and the trees or flowers, me and the earth, me and the skies and sun and stars, me and the moon; an infinity of pure relationships ... that makes our eternity for each one of us... This, if we knew it, is our life and our eternity; the subtle, perfected relation between me and my whole circumambient universe.

Lawrence may have been a tosspot in so many ways, but he got one or two things right.
trixtah: (Default)
While we're on the topic of the wonders of the 'verse, it seems that the Hubble telescope will no longer be maintained. That's a sad thing. Spending zillions on trying to get people like Richard Branson into space seems to indicate that some of our priorities are screwed up.

I'm downloading some wallpaper pics from the Hubble site right now (I know it's not going to fall to pieces right away, but still). Awesome, awesome pics.

Ranting some more about the pantheism thing again, I've discovered one reason why the word hadn't really entered my consciousness in the way it has NOW. A secondary meaning is that of a belief in ALL gods. I can kind of see how that meaning came about (if you see god in everything), but that's not where I'm coming from....
trixtah: (Default)
... I've already covered sex (a bit), I'll do some politics soon, I'm sure. :-)

One of the difficulties I've had with conventional religion - and thus the attraction to pantheism - is how limiting people's notions are of what god must be. Most religions conceive of god as being infinite. How and why would an infinite being find the machinations of us earthlings of any personal use? Why would a being like that "care"? How can we possibly project such a notion of "personality" and "emotions" onto an infinite being? And don't people have problems with the idea of a "creator"? If there is such a thing as a creator, surely it was created at some time. By what?

Squashing down our notions of god into one "thing" (or collections of things, if you believe in multiple gods) seems terribly insulting, given the fascination and variety of our planet/solar system/galaxy/universe/universes...

Faith

Jan. 24th, 2005 12:42 pm
trixtah: (Default)
I've always called myself an agnostic, since I don't believe in a personal god, but I'm not so arrogant to say that there's NOTHING out there. Simply, how can one be sure, either way? So I could never have considered myself an atheist.

I don't know how I came across the word recently, but in the last couple of months, I've had the realisation that I could properly call myself a pantheist. This is the belief that everything in the universe is "divine" - there is no separate personification of a god or gods. Here's a good overview. I had a look at the Wikipedia article, but it's not worth linking to. Like most belief systems, there are all sorts of different strands, but I seem to find myself at home in the branch called "naturalistic pantheism". I strongly identify with that feeling of awe (one might as well call it religious) when encountering the beauties of nature. There is nothing like being in a gorgeous spot, with trees or water or stars or what-have-you, to make you feel that there has to be something divine about the universe. Or universes. My most religious moments have been in those kinds of settings; or, frankly, while having sex, which really is the best way to appreciate divinity in others.

Another strand which is prominent is called "scientific pantheism", which is closely related to the naturalistic kind, but seems to demand that you make the assertion that there is nothing like a soul. All there is in existance is matter and energy. Which makes me ask, necessarily, whether a soul may not just be another form of energy, but who knows. I'm agnostic on the idea of soul, which makes me a little wary of dogmatism when people say there isn't such a thing. Also, being a homeopath, I know that there is such a thing as qi, which isn't accepted in the Western scientific tradition. But, other than being overly restrictive in that sense, their explanations of pantheism are good.

The only problem I have with some of these pantheistic sites is their co-option of "celebrities" (such as Einstein), who they claim to be pantheists. I have no problem with them saying that these people have expressed thoughts in keeping with pantheism, but unless they've stood up and used the word themselves, no-one else has the right to ascribe such a belief to them. It reminds me of all the early coming-out things which used to make lists of all the famous "gays" in history. It's just a wee bit juvenile.

Anyway, religious belief - is really a matter of trying to find meaning in existence. It is necessary (not for me), but like most other humans, I can't help feeling it'd be nice if there were some point to it all (I just happen not to think there is any agency behind what we do, whether or not existence is completely pointless and random).

Profile

trixtah: (Default)
Trixtah

January 2016

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425 2627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags