trixtah: (Default)
There's a stupid fucker over on Wikipedia at the moment, who keeps reinstating a "notability" tag on Patrick Califia's entry. Now, it's no secret that I'm not Califia's greatest fan evar (although he has contributed many crucial things to how women now discuss and enact their sexuality, especially the deviant kind), but to question his notability is ridiculous. I'm personally grateful for plenty of his work and the resultant change in discourse, and I know plenty of people who are definitely fans and who acknowledge his contribution.

I edited the notability tag, which was promptly reverted. However, someone else reverted the reversion, which has stuck for now. If others would like to check in on the article occasionally - or figure out what the fucker wants (see the page history) in terms of assuring notability, since a comprehensive bibliography from "obscure small presses" apparently doesn't prove a thing - please go ahead.

If I had the time at present, I'd actually stick in some citations, since there should definitely be some more in there. The notability issue is just petty [homo|trans]phobia.

trixtah: (Default)
cut because I'm going to bitch majorly about someone who's not one of the usual suspects )

Sez me, bitching.

I hate passive-aggressive bitchiness. Reminds me of school where bunches of sanctimonious little girly-girls would get together and pick on everyone else who wasn't as well-dressed or feminine or who didn't have the right things to play with... I usually hit all those particular lacks. When I retaliated in my usual inappropriate manner (swearing, fighting, whatever), they were the wounded ones, and they quickly got the authorities on their side. It took me a looong time to get over my suspiciousness of a certain class of ultra-femme female. Well, it's still there, but I can usually reserve judgment until I see what their behaviour proves. And that particular behavioural example has got that individual well and truly on MY kill list.

Must pack. Hawaii tomorrow. 6:30am at airport. I evidently need a holiday, I've been such a sour cow these last few weeks.
trixtah: (Default)
Being the amazingly dutiful daughter that I am, I booked all the accomodation for my mother's visit. She arrives Sunday. The dates were a bit vague at first, so I booked places anyway, assuming that it'd be fairly straightforward to twiddle a day either way for both sets of hotels. I read the terms and conditions at booking time, and nothing there contradicted my assumption. However, according to the world that lastminute.com inhabits (bugger linking to them), it is NOT straightforward, or, indeed, possible to modify the booking.

What I wanted to do was extend my mother's stay in Canberra by one day, and reduce our stay in Melbourne by a day. I sent an email to lastminute last week. No reply. So I rang them. They said, "We're still working through our mail backlog", and I said that since time was running out, it'd be nice to sort it out then and there. Okay. So they said they'd have to call the hotel to get the booking reduced. I'd already contacted the hotel directly to do it, but they fobbed me off back to lastminute. Hold hold hold... Finally, the operator gets back and says no, the booking cannot be altered. I did a big WTF?! (politely), and she parroted the line that lastminute has to abide by the terms of the accomodation provider, and said provider does not allow any alteration of internet bookings WHATSOEVER. I didn't recall seeing any such terms and conditions when I booked, so I checked.

Here is the fun stuff for your edification:
1. In many cases we are acting as disclosed agents for a third party supplier and in each of these cases your contract is between you and them. You will be subject to their terms and conditions and you must read these before proceeding with your order.

D. Specifically with regard to accomodation booked on the site,
If you wish to cancel your hotel booking you must contact our Customer Service Team on 1300 132 799 (+61 2 9249 6070) a minimum of 24hrs before your arrival. Contact must be made between 9:00am and 5:30pm AEST. We will contact the hotel on your behalf. Some hotels may accept a cancellation (with or without a cancellation charge) but it is entirely at their discretion. As part of the terms of sale, they are not obligated to accept any cancellations and you may be charged for the entire length of stay. In the event that the hotel will allow a cancellation, you will be charged an administration fee of AUD35.00 per booking by lastminute.com. This will be in addition to any cancellation charges the hotel may impose.

[bold per the site]

So, ok, the hotel does not have to allow any alterations to the booking. I think that's crap, given reasonable notice, but c'est la vie. What gets me is the FIRST clause, where it says, You will be subject to their terms and conditions and you must read these before proceeding with your order.

There was no fucking terms and conditions from the hotel I booked. None at all!

So I called back, and pointed out this slight inconsistency.

Was I expected, before completing a booking, to go to the provider's website and check their terms and conditions THERE before finishing the booking on lastminute.com?
No, of course not. (Also, the terms and conditions between the hotel and lastminute.com might be different to those on their own web site).
So how AM I supposed to see what their terms and conditions are before I booked? I wouldn't have booked with that hotel if I'd been aware of that particular gotcha.
The accomodation provider is under no obligation to refund anything, as you can see in our terms and conditions.
Yes, I did see that, since I HAVE read your terms and conditions, including the part where it says that I should read the provider's terms and conditions before completing the booking. Once again, how was I supposed to do that? I think that your site is wilfully misleading.
It's not misleading, it's very clear that the provider does not have to provide a refund.
And it also does not say that they WON'T. And it tells me how to alter a booking, and cites a cancellation charge (not that I'm cancelling), so by implication you say that it is possible.
But it is up to the individual provider.
While I was unable to ascertain what the provider was or was not willing to do due to the MISLEADING information on your website!

...Rinse and repeat. After a couple of iterations of this, I was unable to maintain the "calm and reasonable" thing (since I am not a particularly calm or reasonable person), and said thxkbye and hung up.

Not sure where to go from here. It seems obvious to me that their first clause implies that they WILL provide the terms and conditions of the individual operator, but they do not. There is also a reasonable assumption (reasonable to me), that most hotels will accept a cancellation of all or part of a booking, given notice and perhaps payment of a fee, unless otherwise specified. Of course, I'm sure it'll be argued that it doesn't matter what "common practice" might be, they aren't under any obligation. I do think that all of that should be spelled out in the operator's terms and conditions, which are not available in any form on lastminute.com, although they are well and truly available on other web booking sites (such as wotif.com). And I think it is misleading in the legal sense, but who the hell am I to know.

I don't think that they should get away with this. I'm sure I am not the first and only one to be sucked in by something similar. I think there's such a thing as a consumer ombudsman here in Canberra. I'll see how far I get with it. If it was something like $50, I might say the hell, but $240 is enough to be bloody annoying.

Profile

trixtah: (Default)
Trixtah

January 2016

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425 2627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags